While travel bonds are a widely used financial protection method, they aren't the only option available for travel companies. The PTRs allow for several mechanisms to protect customer funds, and the most suitable choice depends on the company’s business model and cash flow.
Let's explore the two main alternatives to travel bonds:
Trust Accounts
A travel trust account is a separate bank account managed by an independent trustee and is used by travel companies to hold client funds until the services are provided.
Pros: Trust accounts are a secure and reliable form of financial protection, as the customer's money is completely segregated from the travel company's operational funds. This travel consumer protection method is also generally favoured by merchant acquirers as it significantly reduces the risk they take on.
Cons: Travel trust accounts also have their downsides, as not giving the travel provider the option to access customer funds before they travel can restrict cash flow.
Generally, trust accounts are best suited for well-established travel companies with substantial cash reserves, as they can operate without relying on cash flow from customers' advance payments.
Financial Failure Insurance (FFI)
Financial failure insurance is a type of specialised insurance policy that protects customers from financial loss when a travel company they've purchased services from becomes insolvent.
Pros: Many FFI providers offer more flexible payment options than travel bonds, making it a suitable financial protection option for travel companies prone to cash flow challenges.
Cons: The cost of FFI typically fluctuates with sales volume, making long-term budgeting challenging.
Generally, FFI is well-suited to businesses that need flexible and lower-cost travel consumer protection solutions, such as new travel businesses and established ones with highly seasonal sales patterns.